UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
GNU indirect function (ifunc) is a mechanism making a direct function call resolve to an implementation picked by a resolver. It is mainly used in glibc but has adoption in FreeBSD.
For some performance critical functions, e.g. memcpy/memset/strcpy, glibc provides multiple implementations optimized for different architecture levels. The application just uses memcpy(...)
which compiles to call memcpy
. The linker will create a PLT for memcpy
and produce an associated special dynamic relocation referencing the resolver symbol/address. During relocation resolving at runtime, the return value of the resolver will be placed in the GOT entry and the PLT entry will load the address.
Representation
ifunc has a dedicated symbol type STT_GNU_IFUNC
to mark it different from a regular function (STT_FUNC
).
Assembly behavior
In assembly, you can assign the type STT_GNU_IFUNC
to a symbol via .type foo, @gnu_indirect_function
. An ifunc symbol is typically STB_GLOBAL
.
The section and value of an STT_GNU_IFUNC
symbol indicate the resolver. After linking, if the symbol is still STT_GNU_IFUNC
, the value indicates the resolver address in the linked image.
Example
1 | cat > b.s <<e |
GNU as makes transitive aliases to an STT_GNU_IFUNC
ifunc as well.
1 | .type foo,@gnu_indirect_function |
GCC and Clang support a function attribute which emits .type ifunc, @gnu_indirect_function; .set ifunc, resolver
:
1 | static int impl(void) { return 42; } |
Preemptible ifunc
A preemptible ifunc call is no different from a regular function call from the linker perspective.
The linker creates a PLT entry, reserves an associated GOT entry, and emits an R_*_JUMP_SLOT
relocation resolving the address into the GOT entry. The PLT code sequence is the same as a regular PLT for STT_FUNC
.
If the ifunc is defined within the module, the symbol type in the linked image is STT_GNU_IFUNC
, otherwise (defined in a DSO), the symbol type is STT_FUNC
.
The difference resides in the loader.
At runtime, the relocation resolver checks whether the R_*_JUMP_SLOT
relocation refers to an ifunc. If it does, instead of filling the GOT entry with the target address, the resolver calls the target address as an indirect function, with ABI specified additional parameters (hwcap related), and places the return value into the GOT entry.
Non-preemptible ifunc
The non-preemptible ifunc case is where all sorts of complexity come from.
First, the R_*_JUMP_SLOT
relocation type cannot be used in some cases:
- A non-preemptible ifunc may not have a dynamic symbol table entry. It can be local. It can be defined in the executable without the need to export.
- A non-local STV_DEFAULT symbol defined in a shared object is by default preemptible. Using
R_*_JUMP_SLOT
for such a case will make the ifunc look like preemptible.
Therefore a new relocation type R_*_IRELATIVE
was introduced. There is no associated symbol and the address indicates the resolver.
1 | R_*_RELATIVE: B + A |
When an R_*_JUMP_SLOT
can be used, there is a trade-off between R_*_JUMP_SLOT
and R_*_IRELATIVE
: an R_*_JUMP_SLOT
can be lazily resolved but needs a symbol lookup.
A PLT entry is needed for two reasons:
- The call sites emit instructions like
call foo
. We need to forward them to a place to perform the indirection. Text relocations are not an option. - If the ifunc is exported, we need a place to mark its canonical address.
On many architectures (e.g. AArch64/PowerPC/x86), the PLT code sequence is the same as a regular PLT, but it could be different.
On x86-64, the code sequence is:
1 | jmp *got(%rip) |
Since there is no lazy binding, pushq $0; jmp .plt
are not needed. However, to make all PLT entries of the same shape to simplify linker implementations and facilitate analyzers, it is find to keep it this way.
.rela.dyn vs .rela.plt
LLD placed R_*_IRELATIVE
in the .rela.plt
section because many ports of GNU ld behaved this way. While implementing ifunc for PowerPC, I noticed that GNU ld powerpc actually places R_*_IRELATIVE
in .rela.dyn
and glibc powerpc does not actually support R_*_IRELATIVE
in .rela.plt
. This makes a lot of sense to me because .rela.plt
normally just contains R_*_JUMP_SLOT
which can be lazily resolved. ifunc relocations need to be eagerly resolved so .rela.plt
was a misplace. Therefore I changed LLD to use .rela.dyn
in https://reviews.llvm.org/D65651.
__rela_iplt_start
and __rela_iplt_end
A statically linked position dependent executable traditionally had no dynamic relocations.
With ifunc, these R_*_IRELATIVE
relocations must be resolved at runtime. Such relocations are in a magic array delimitered by __rela_iplt_start
and __rela_iplt_end
. In glibc, csu/libc-start.c
has special code processing the relocation range.
GNU ld and gold define __rela_iplt_start
in -no-pie
mode, but not in -pie
mode. LLD defines __rela_iplt_start
regardless of -no-pie
, -pie
or -shared
.
In glibc, static pie uses self-relocation (_dl_relocate_static_pie
) to take care of R_*_IRELATIVE
. The above magic array code is executed by static pie as well. If __rela_iplt_start
/__rela_iplt_end
are defined, we will get 0 < __rela_iplt_start < __rela_iplt_end
in csu/libc-start.c
. ARCH_SETUP_IREL
will crash when resolving the first relocation which has been processed.
I think the difference in the diff -u =(ld.bfd --verbose) =(ld.bfd -pie --verbose)
output is unneeded. https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2021-January/121755.html
Address significance
A non-GOT-generating non-PLT-generating relocation referencing a STT_GNU_IFUNC
indicates a potential address-taken operation.
With a function attribute, the compilers knows that a symbol indicates an ifunc and will avoid generating such relocations. With assembly such relocations may be unavoidable.
In most cases the linker needs to convert the symbol type to STT_FUNC
and create a special PLT entry, which is called a "canonical PLT entry" in LLD. References from other modules will resolve to the PLT entry to keep pointer equality: the address taken from the defining module should match the address taken from another module.
This approach has pros and cons:
- With a canonical PLT entry, the resolver of a symbol is called only once.
- If the relocation appears in a non-
SHF_WRITE
section, a text relocation can be avoided. - Relocation types which are not valid dynamic relocation types are supported. GNU ld may error
relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol `ifunc' isn't supported
- References will bind to the canonical PLT entry. A function call needs to jump to the PLT, loads the value from the GOT, then does an indirect call.
For a symbolic relocation type (a special case of absolute relocation types where the width matches the word size) like R_X86_64_64
, when the addend is 0 and the section has the SHF_WRITE
flag, the linker can emit an R_X86_64_IRELATIVE
. https://reviews.llvm.org/D65995 dropped the case.
For the following example, GNU ld linked a.out
calls fff_resolver
three times while LLD calls it once.
1 |
|
Relocation resolving order
R_*_IRELATIVE
relocations are resolved eagerly. In glibc, there used to be a problem where ifunc resolvers ran before GL(dl_hwcap)
and GL(dl_hwcap2)
were set up https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27072.
Fr the relocation resolver, the main executable needs to be processed the last to process R_*_COPY
. Without ifunc, the resolving order of shared objects can be arbitrary.
For ifunc, if the ifunc is defined in a processed module, it is fine. If the ifunc is defined in an unprocessed module, it may crash.
For an ifunc defined in an executable, calling it from a shared object can be problematic because the executable's relocations haven't been resolved. The issue can be circumvented by converting the non-preemptible ifunc defined in the executable to STT_FUNC
. GNU ld's x86 port made the change PR23169.