Dig Dug TryHackMe Walkthrough
嗯,用户让我帮忙总结一篇文章,控制在一百个字以内,而且不需要特定的开头。首先,我需要仔细阅读文章内容,抓住主要信息。 文章讲的是一个TryHackMe的房间,叫做Dig Dug,专注于DNS枚举。目标是从DNS记录中提取隐藏的数据,而不是传统的服务利用。作者通过nmap扫描发现SSH服务,但没看到DNS端口53。不过根据房间描述,目标像DNS服务器。于是使用dig命令查询特定域名givemetheflag.com,结果返回了一个TXT记录,里面包含flag。用nslookup验证结果一致。 总结时要突出DNS枚举、提取隐藏数据、dig命令查询、TXT记录和flag获取这几个关键点。同时控制在100字以内,所以需要简洁明了。 可能的结构:介绍房间类型、目标、使用工具和结果。确保涵盖主要步骤和结论。 最后检查字数是否符合要求,并确保语言流畅自然。 </think> 这篇文章描述了一个TryHackMe房间“Dig Dug”,专注于通过DNS枚举提取隐藏数据。作者通过nmap扫描发现目标暴露了SSH服务但未显示DNS端口53。根据提示,目标仅响应对givemetheflag.com域名的请求。使用dig命令查询该域名后,获得一个包含flag的TXT记录,并通过nslookup验证结果一致。 2026-4-9 07:47:53 Author: infosecwriteups.com(查看原文) 阅读量:7 收藏

Death Esther

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Introduction

Dig Dug is a quick TryHackMe room focused on DNS enumeration, where the goal is to extract hidden data directly from DNS records instead of exploiting traditional services. It’s a clean, practical lab that reinforces protocol-level thinking.

Room link: https://tryhackme.com/room/digdug

Initial Reconnaissance

I started with a basic service scan to understand what was exposed on the target.

kali@kali:~$ nmap -sV 10.49.173.146
Starting Nmap 7.94SVN ( https://nmap.org ) at 2026-01-08 20:12 IST
Nmap scan report for 10.49.173.146
Host is up (0.027s latency).
Not shown: 999 closed tcp ports (conn-refused)
PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION
22/tcp open ssh OpenSSH 8.2p1 Ubuntu 4ubuntu0.13 (Ubuntu Linux; protocol 2.0)
Service Info: OS: Linux; CPE: cpe:/o:linux:linux_kernel

From the scan alone, nothing stood out apart from SSH. Port 53 didn’t show up here, but the room description made it clear this machine was behaving like a DNS server. That mismatch was the first real signal that DNS interaction mattered more than traditional enumeration.

The description also mentioned something specific: the server only responds to a particular request for the givemetheflag.com domain. That narrowed the scope immediately.

Get Death Esther’s stories in your inbox

Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.

Remember me for faster sign in

I queried the DNS service directly using dig, pointing it at the target IP.

kali@kali:~$ dig givemetheflag.com @10.49.173.146

; <<>> DiG 9.18.39-0ubuntu0.24.04.2-Ubuntu <<>> givemetheflag.com @10.49.173.146
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 61510
;; flags: qr aa; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;givemetheflag.com. IN A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
givemetheflag.com. 0 IN TXT "flag{0767ccd06e79853318f25aeb08ff83e2}"

;; Query time: 30 msec
;; SERVER: 10.49.173.146#53(10.49.173.146) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Thu Jan 08 20:16:42 IST 2026
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 86

The response came back clean and authoritative. Instead of an A record, the server returned a TXT record containing the flag.

flag{0767ccd06e79853318f25aeb08ff83e2}

For confirmation, I repeated the same lookup using nslookup.

Both tools returned the same result, confirming the flag was stored directly in the DNS TXT record exposed by the server.

Conclusion

Dig Dug is a compact room that revolves entirely around understanding DNS behavior rather than traditional service exploitation. The challenge highlights how data can be exposed through DNS records and how a single, well-crafted query can reveal everything when the context is read correctly.

Thanks for reading this walkthrough.


文章来源: https://infosecwriteups.com/dig-dug-tryhackme-walkthrough-5ecaf8fb0f33?source=rss----7b722bfd1b8d---4
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh