嗯，用户让我总结一下这篇文章的内容，控制在100字以内，而且不需要用“文章内容总结”之类的开头。首先，我需要通读整篇文章，抓住主要信息。 文章讲的是欧洲议员们通过了一项意见，建议16岁以下的青少年在没有父母同意的情况下不能使用社交媒体，而13岁以下的孩子则完全禁止。这看起来是针对青少年使用社交媒体的限制措施。 接着，文章提到欧盟在11月通过了一个决议，呼吁设定儿童不能使用社交媒体的年龄门槛。现在最新的行动是在更广泛的禁止青少年使用社交媒体的运动背景下进行的。西班牙、法国、荷兰和英国等国家最近几周都表示计划禁止15或16岁以下的孩子使用社交媒体，澳大利亚已经在去年12月实施了类似的规定。 此外，欧洲议会的新闻稿提到，这项意见支持在整个欧盟范围内进行有效且尊重隐私的年龄验证，并呼吁加强现有法律的执行力度，以保护儿童在线安全。意见还建议将这些规定纳入未来的《数字公平法案》中，并涵盖定向广告、网红推广、成瘾性设计功能和视频游戏中的虚拟货币等内容。 不过，欧洲议会没有提出新法律的能力，他们的意见不具备约束力，但可以影响欧盟委员会在立法上的方法。此外，意见还讨论了人工智能规则的风险，并强调了制定统一的欧洲策略的重要性，包括安全设计、算法透明度、数据最小化、心理健康预防、隐私优先的年龄验证、数字素养和基于证据的评估等方面。 最后，意见指出欧盟策略应为青少年提供一致的保护，并承认父母的责任。父母应接受关于社交媒体风险的教育，以便做出明智决定。 总结一下主要内容：欧洲议员提议禁止未满16岁的青少年未经父母同意使用社交媒体，并全面禁止13岁以下儿童使用。各国如西班牙、法国等也计划采取类似措施。意见还建议将这些规定纳入未来的法律中，并涉及广告、网红推广等多方面内容。 </think> European lawmakers approved an opinion restricting social media access for minors, proposing a ban for children under 13 and requiring parental consent for those aged 16 and below. The move aligns with a broader trend across Europe and other countries to limit young people's online presence, emphasizing child protection, privacy, and digital literacy. 2026-2-27 16:15:41 Author: therecord.media(查看原文) 阅读量:1 收藏
European lawmakers on Thursday approved an opinion proposing that youth under 16 not be allowed to access social media platforms without parental consent. The opinion also states that social media access should not be allowed for children below age 13 under any circumstances. In November, the European Parliament passed a resolution calling on the EU to set threshold ages under which children cannot access social media. Parliament’s latest action comes amid a sweeping movement to ban social media for younger teens. In recent weeks, Spain, France, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom all have said they either plan to ban social media for children under age 15 or 16 or have said they are studying such a move. Australia banned social media for youth under age 16 in December. “The opinion promotes effective and privacy-friendly age verification across the European Union and calls for stronger and more consistent enforcement of existing laws protecting children online,” a Parliament press release said. The text of the opinion proposes that a ban be included in a future law known as the Digital Fairness Act and argues that practices like targeted advertising, influencer promotions, addictive design features and virtual currencies in video games be covered by the new legislation. The European Parliament lacks the ability to propose new laws and its opinions are not binding, but they can inform and influence the European Commission’s approach on legislation like the Digital Fairness Act. The opinion also addresses artificial intelligence rules, underscoring that the tools pose risks related to misinformation, manipulation and emotional dependency, “The impact of social media on young people requires a unified European strategy combining safety-by-design, algorithmic transparency and control, data minimisation, mental health prevention, privacy-first age assurance, digital literacy, participatory governance and evidence-based evaluation to ensure equal protection and empowerment for all,” the opinion states. It stresses that the EU strategy should establish “consistent” protection for youth while also “recognizing parental responsibility.” Parents should be educated about the dangers social media pose so they can make informed decisions, the opinion states.
Get more insights with the
Recorded Future
Intelligence Cloud.
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh