How I Bought a $1400 Jacket for Free Using a Business Logic Flaw
嗯,用户让我总结一下这篇文章的内容,控制在一百个字以内,而且不需要用“文章内容总结”之类的开头。首先,我得仔细阅读这篇文章,了解它的主要观点。 文章讲的是一个电子商务平台的安全漏洞,特别是业务逻辑上的缺陷。作者发现了一个可以利用优惠券叠加漏洞来免费购买商品的方法。具体来说,用户先用新客户优惠券NEWCUST5减了5美元,然后又用注册优惠券SIGNUP30减了401美元,结果商品价格变成了零。 看起来这个漏洞是因为系统没有正确跟踪之前应用的优惠券,只验证了最后一个优惠券的有效性。这导致总价被错误地重新计算了。作者成功下单并免费获得了价值1400美元的夹克。 总结一下,文章描述了一个通过优惠券叠加漏洞实现免费购物的情况,揭示了业务逻辑缺陷的严重性。用户的需求是让这个内容简洁明了地呈现出来,不超过一百个字。 我需要确保涵盖关键点:电子商务平台、优惠券叠加、总价错误计算、免费下单。同时保持语言简洁流畅。 可能的表达方式:“文章描述了一名安全研究人员如何利用电子商务平台的业务逻辑漏洞,通过叠加新客户和注册优惠券实现免费购买商品的情况。” 这样既涵盖了主要人物、动作、结果和问题所在。 检查一下字数是否符合要求:刚好在一百字以内。同时没有使用任何开头模板,直接进入描述。 这样应该能满足用户的需求了。 </think> 文章描述了一名安全研究人员如何利用电子商务平台的业务逻辑漏洞,通过叠加新客户和注册优惠券实现免费购买商品的情况。 2026-2-22 14:57:14 Author: infosecwriteups.com(查看原文) 阅读量:6 收藏

Aashif

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Business logic flaws are some of the most dangerous yet overlooked vulnerabilities in modern web applications. They don’t rely on complex payloads or advanced tools—just understanding how the application is supposed to work and finding where it doesn’t.

🎯 Target Overview

The application was an e-commerce platform selling premium clothing items. One particular product caught my attention:

Product: Lightweight l33t leather jacket

Price: ~$1400

User account: Standard customer account

The platform also offered multiple promotional features:

  • New customer discount coupons
  • Newsletter signup rewards

At first glance, everything looked normal.

🧠 Initial Testing

After logging in, I added the leather jacket to my cart and moved to checkout.

Coupon #1 – New Customer Offer

The site advertised a coupon for new customers:

NEWCUST5

Applying this coupon reduced the price by $5, as expected.

I tried basic abuse techniques:

  • Logging out and back in
  • Changing the email address
  • Reapplying the coupon

➡️ Result: Coupon reuse was blocked. So far, so good.

🔍 Finding Another Discount Path

While browsing the site further, I noticed a newsletter signup option at the bottom of the home page.

It promised a discount for signing up.

After subscribing, I received a new coupon:

SIGNUP30

When applied at checkout, this coupon reduced the cart value by $401, effectively covering the entire jacket cost.

Get Aashif’s stories in your inbox

Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.

This immediately raised a red flag 🚩.

💥 Exploitation: Coupon Stacking Logic Flaw

Here’s where things got interesting.

Step-by-step Exploitation

1. Added the leather jacket to the cart
2. Applied NEWCUST5
3. Applied SIGNUP30 afterward

What Should Have Happened?

The application should reject multiple coupons

Or validate whether discounts exceed product value

Or restrict coupon combinations

What Actually Happened?

The application only validated the last coupon. It did not track previously applied discounts. The total price was recalculated incorrectly.

➡️ Final cart value: $0

No errors. No warnings.

🛒 Order Placement

I proceeded to place the order.

✔️ Order confirmed
✔️ No payment required
✔️ Premium item successfully purchased for free

Impact achieved.

> Business Logic Flaw – Coupon Reuse / Coupon Stacking

📉 Impact

This issue could lead to:

  • Complete revenue loss on high-value products
  • Abuse by automated scripts
  • Loss of trust in promotional systems

🏁 Final Thoughts

This bug wasn’t about bypassing authentication or injecting payloads—it was about thinking logically and questioning assumptions.

If you’re starting out in bug bounty hunting, business logic bugs are gold:

  • Less competition
  • High impact
  • Hard to detect automatically

文章来源: https://infosecwriteups.com/how-i-bought-a-1400-jacket-for-free-using-a-business-logic-flaw-3b60b31252d0?source=rss----7b722bfd1b8d---4
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh