Prompt Injection in Agentic AI
嗯,用户让我总结一篇文章的内容,控制在100字以内,而且不需要特定的开头。首先,我需要理解文章的主要内容。看起来这篇文章是关于作者进行的AI安全评估经验分享,特别是涉及LLM和AI代理的区别、威胁模型以及发现的安全漏洞。 用户可能是一位研究人员或者安全专家,希望快速了解文章的核心内容。他们可能对AI安全评估的具体步骤和结果感兴趣。所以,我需要抓住关键点:评估目标、LLM与AI代理的区别、威胁模型、发现的安全漏洞以及生成网站的复杂性。 接下来,我要确保总结简洁明了,不超过100字。可能的结构是先点明主题,然后简要描述评估内容和发现的问题。这样用户能迅速获取主要信息。 最后,检查语言是否符合要求,避免使用“文章内容总结”之类的开头,直接进入描述。 </think> 作者分享了其参与的一次AI安全评估经验,重点介绍了LLM与AI代理的区别、威胁模型以及发现的安全漏洞。评估对象是一款利用LLM生成完整网站的产品,包括身份验证机制、用户角色和数据库架构等复杂功能。 2026-1-26 09:13:26 Author: infosecwriteups.com(查看原文) 阅读量:1 收藏

Rahul Singh Chauhan

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Photo by Alex Knight on Unsplash

Hi everyone

In this article, I’ll be sharing my experience working on an agentic AI security assessment that I conducted a few months ago.

The goal of this write-up is to walk you through:

  • The AI assessment itself
  • The differences between a traditional LLM and an AI agent
  • The threat model used during the assessment
  • A security bug I discovered along the way

The Assessment

I was assigned to an assessment that involved a product with a significant LLM-powered component. The client had recently introduced a feature that allowed users to generate complete websites using AI.

These weren’t just static or basic websites. The generated applications included:

  • Authentication and authorization mechanisms
  • Well-defined user roles
  • A properly structured database schema

Before generating the actual website, the system first created a blueprint. This blueprint outlined:

  • The number of pages and how they were interconnected
  • User roles and permissions
  • The database schema

文章来源: https://infosecwriteups.com/prompt-injection-in-agentic-ai-66b93b52fe48?source=rss----7b722bfd1b8d---4
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh