Internet Voting is Too Insecure for Use in Elections
好的，我现在需要帮用户总结一篇文章的内容，控制在100字以内，并且不需要特定的开头。首先，我得仔细阅读文章内容，抓住主要观点。 文章开头提到互联网投票的安全性问题反复出现，作者希望通过这封信暂时阻止这种趋势。接着，执行摘要部分指出科学家们早已知道互联网投票不安全，目前也没有技术能使其安全。然而，供应商和Bradley Tusk等人仍然声称他们的系统不同或安全性问题无关紧要，这被认为是误导和危险的。 用户的要求是用中文总结，所以我要将这些关键点浓缩成简洁的句子。需要注意的是，不要使用“文章内容总结”之类的开头词，直接描述内容即可。 可能的结构是：科学家指出互联网投票不安全且无法通过现有技术解决；供应商和相关机构却声称系统安全或问题不重要；这导致误导和危险。 最后检查字数是否在100字以内，并确保语言流畅自然。 </think> 科学家指出互联网投票存在安全隐患且无法通过现有技术解决，尽管如此，供应商和相关机构仍声称其系统安全或问题无关紧要，这种行为具有误导性和危险性。 2026-1-21 12:5:50 Author: www.schneier.com(查看原文) 阅读量:0 收藏

No matter how many times we say it, the idea comes back again and again. Hopefully, this letter will hold back the tide for at least a while longer.

Executive summary: Scientists have understood for many years that internet voting is insecure and that there is no known or foreseeable technology that can make it secure. Still, vendors of internet voting keep claiming that, somehow, their new system is different, or the insecurity doesn’t matter. Bradley Tusk and his Mobile Voting Foundation keep touting internet voting to journalists and election administrators; this whole effort is misleading and dangerous.

I am one of the many signatories.

Tags: ,

Posted on January 21, 2026 at 7:05 AM • 3 Comments

Sidebar photo of Bruce Schneier by Joe MacInnis.


文章来源: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2026/01/internet-voting-is-too-insecure-for-use-in-elections.html
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh