嗯，用户让我帮忙总结一下这篇文章的内容，控制在一百个字以内，而且不需要用“文章内容总结”或者“这篇文章”这样的开头。好的，我先仔细读一下文章。 文章讲的是埃隆·马斯克的政府效率部门（DOGE）的两名成员可能访问并分享了社会安全号码，目的是帮助一个倡导团体在某些州推翻选举结果。这些信息来自法庭文件， Politico 最先报道了这个消息。DOGE的两名成员和那个倡导团体都没有在文件中被命名。 接着，文章提到在2025年3月，一个政治倡导团体联系了DOGE团队的两名成员，请求他们分析该团体获得的州选民名单。他们的目标是寻找选民欺诈的证据，并推翻某些州的选举结果。其中一名DOGE成员作为社会保障管理局（SSA）的员工，签署并发送了一份“选民数据协议”给该倡导团体。 此外，DOGE成员可能访问了当时被法院禁止访问的私人信息，并将数据分享到未经批准的第三方服务器上。目前尚不清楚这两人是否最终分享了数据，但邮件表明他们可能被要求协助该团体访问SSA数据以匹配选民名单。SSA将这两人转介给潜在违反哈奇法案的行为进行调查。 去年，一名联邦法官下令阻止DOGE成员访问SSA系统，其中包括社会安全号码、医疗记录、驾驶执照号码、税务信息和其他个人信息。后来有SSA的举报人声称DOGE将数亿社会安全记录上传到一个易受攻击的云服务器上。 现在我需要把这些信息浓缩到100字以内。首先确定关键点：DOGE两名成员可能分享社会安全号码帮助推翻选举结果；涉及法律诉讼；数据泄露风险；违反哈奇法案；举报人指控上传大量记录到不安全服务器。 然后组织语言：马斯克政府效率部门两名成员涉嫌获取并分享社会安全号码协助某政治团体推翻选举结果，涉及法律纠纷和数据泄露风险。 检查字数：大约50字左右，符合要求。 </think> 马斯克政府效率部门两名成员涉嫌获取并分享社会安全号码协助某政治团体推翻选举结果, 涉及法律纠纷和数据泄露风险. 2026-1-20 21:31:57 Author: techcrunch.com(查看原文) 阅读量:0 收藏
Two members of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency may have accessed and shared Social Security numbers in an effort to help an advocacy group “overturn election results in certain States” last year, according to court documents.
The revelation, which was first reported by Politico, comes as part of a series of corrections to previous testimony by top Social Security Administration officials related to legal battles over DOGE’s access to Social Security data.
Neither the two DOGE members, nor the advocacy group, are named in the court documents.
In March 2025, a political advocacy group contacted two members of the DOGE team at the Social Security Administration (SSA) “with a request to analyze state voter rolls that the advocacy group had acquired,” Elizabeth Shapiro, a Justice Department official, wrote in the court documents.
“The advocacy group’s stated aim was to find evidence of voter fraud and to overturn election results in certain States,” said Shapiro.
Shapiro wrote that after these communications, one of the DOGE members, as an SSA employee, signed and sent a “Voter Data Agreement” with the advocacy group.
The DOGE members may have accessed private information that was ruled to be off-limits by a court at the time, and shared data on unapproved “third-party” servers.
Techcrunch event
San Francisco | October 13-15, 2026
“At this time, there is no evidence that SSA employees outside of the involved members of the DOGE Team were aware of the communications with the advocacy group. Nor were they aware of the ‘Voter Data Agreement’,” Shapiro wrote.
It’s unclear if the two DOGE members ended up sharing the data, according to Shapiro, but emails “suggest that DOGE Team members could have been asked to assist the advocacy group by accessing SSA data to match to the voter rolls.”
According to Shapiro, the SSA referred the two DOGE employees for potential violations of the Hatch Act, a law that prohibits federal workers from leveraging their official positions for political activities.
Last year, a federal judge issued an order to block DOGE’s members access to SSA’s systems, which included SSNs, medical records, drivers’ license numbers, tax information, and other types of personal information. Later on, an SSA whistleblower alleged that DOGE uploaded hundreds of millions of Social Security records to a vulnerable cloud server.
Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai is a Senior Writer at TechCrunch, where he covers hacking, cybersecurity, surveillance, and privacy.
You can contact or verify outreach from Lorenzo by emailing [email protected], via encrypted message at +1 917 257 1382 on Signal, and @lorenzofb on Keybase/Telegram.
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh