Weekly Update 487
嗯,用户让我帮忙总结一下这篇文章的内容,控制在一百个字以内,而且不需要用“文章内容总结”或者“这篇文章”这样的开头,直接写描述就行。首先,我需要仔细阅读文章内容,理解作者的主要观点和情感。 文章的开头提到Scott分享了他的太阳能系统的成本,结果他没有收到预期的AI回应,反而收到了其他愚蠢的回复。而作者自己却收到了AI的回应。这让我想到,作者可能在表达对社交媒体上人们反应的失望或无奈。 接着,作者提到自己花了很多时间写一篇关于隐私的博客,但人们却只关注插图是计算机生成的。这显示出读者可能更关注表面的东西而不是内容本身。同时,作者还提到这种反馈与Mastodon上的政治倾向有关,这可能暗示了社交媒体上的群体思维或偏见。 最后,作者提到那些不需要的愚蠢评论,并特别为这种场合准备了一篇博客:“如果你不想要吉他课,请停止关注我。” 这句话似乎是在表达对这些评论者的厌烦,并提醒他们如果不喜欢内容可以选择不关注。 综合来看,文章主要讨论了社交媒体上人们反应的肤浅和政治倾向的影响,以及对此感到无奈和讽刺的情绪。因此,在总结时需要涵盖这些要点:社交媒体上的反应、对内容的关注点、政治倾向的影响以及讽刺的态度。 接下来是控制在一百个字以内,并且直接描述内容。要确保语言简洁明了,涵盖主要观点:社交媒体反应、插图生成、政治倾向、讽刺态度。 最后检查一下是否符合要求:没有使用“文章内容总结”之类的开头,并且控制在一百字以内。 </think> 文章讨论了社交媒体上人们对深度内容的关注度有限的现象, 描述了读者更倾向于关注表面细节而非核心观点, 并讽刺了这种现象与平台用户的政治倾向之间的关联。 2026-1-18 08:43:10 Author: www.troyhunt.com(查看原文) 阅读量:2 收藏

I thought Scott would cop it first when he posted about what his solar system really cost him last year. "You're so gonna get that stupid AI-slop response from some people", I joked. But no, he got other stupid responses instead! And I got the AI-slop responses! Draw your own conclusions on those comments, but I find it fascinating that the one thing people would take away from a thoughtful blog post I spent many hours writing to explain how much work I put into privacy is that the illustration was computer-generated. That such feedback aligns with the political leanings of folks on Mastodon is also fascinating, and probably something I should have seen coming. But hey, there's nothing new about folks popping their heads up to make inane comments where none were needed, and I have a special blog post for just such occasions: If You Don't Want Guitar Lessons, Stop Following Me.

Listen on Apple Podcasts

Watch and Listen on YouTube

Download via RSS

Weekly update

文章来源: https://www.troyhunt.com/weekly-update-487/
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh