嗯，用户让我帮忙总结一篇文章的内容，控制在100字以内，而且不需要特定的开头。首先，我得仔细阅读这篇文章。看起来是关于Sandfly的博客，他们主要提供无代理的Linux EDR解决方案。 文章提到他们经常被问到与传统代理系统的比较，于是写了一份白皮书，列出了无代理EDR的十大优势。这些优势包括低内核崩溃风险、普遍兼容性、性能开销小等等。最后还提到虽然代理系统有其位置，但缺点也很明显，可能导致企业Linux保护出现盲点。 用户的需求很明确，就是希望得到一个简洁的总结。我需要确保在100字以内涵盖主要内容：Sandfly的产品、白皮书中的十大优势、无代理的优势以及传统代理系统的不足。 可能需要注意的是，用户可能对技术术语不太熟悉，所以用词要尽量简洁明了。同时，避免使用过于专业的术语，让总结更易理解。 总结的时候，先点明Sandfly的产品和博客内容，然后提到白皮书中的十大优势和无代理的优势，最后简要提及传统代理系统的缺点。这样结构清晰，内容全面。 最后检查一下字数是否在限制内，并确保语言流畅自然。 </think> Sandfly作为Linux无代理端点检测与响应（EDR）领域的领导者，在博客中介绍了其无代理安全解决方案的十大优势，包括低内核崩溃风险、普遍兼容性、性能开销小等，并指出传统代理系统在企业Linux保护中可能存在的盲点。 2026-1-6 22:29:13 Author: sandflysecurity.com(查看原文) 阅读量:4 收藏
Sandfly Blog
As the leading provider of agentless Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) for Linux, Sandfly is often asked about how our product compares against traditional endpoint agents. We have a lot of real-world experience in this area and put down the core advantages in this white paper:
Advantages of Agentless EDR for Linux
This white paper goes over the top 10 advantages of agentless security for Linux below:
- Low Risk of Kernel Panics
- Universal Compatibility Across Linux Architectures
- Minimal Performance Overhead
- Kernel Update Conflict Risk
- Instant, Zero-Friction Deployment
- Evasion Resistance
- Superior Detection of Stealthy, Post-Compromise Threats
- Incident Response and Integrity Validation
- Seamless Support of Varied Linux Architectures
- Dramatically Lower Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
Agent-based systems have their place (and Sandfly works alongside them). However, the disadvantages can be significant and lead to massive blind spots in enterprise Linux protection where they can't be deployed.
Read our white paper above, then contact Sandfly today with any questions and we will give you a live demo to show you how fast, safe, and effective agentless security for Linux is.
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh