Prompt Injection Is Permanent: Your AI Agent Needs Seatbelts, Not Smarter Prompts
嗯,用户让我用中文总结一下这篇文章的内容,控制在100字以内,而且不需要用“文章内容总结”或者“这篇文章”这样的开头。直接写描述就行。 首先,我需要通读文章,抓住主要信息。文章主要讲的是安全和IT团队在部署智能体时面临的问题。OpenAI的Atlas模式被提到,它正确处理了一些问题,但也承认还有一些未解决的安全威胁。特别是提到了提示注入攻击,这种攻击很难完全解决,因为它会扩大安全威胁面。 接下来,文章还提到了一个清单,帮助减少智能体的潜在影响范围。清单包括了最小权限、确认门、输入清理和输出验证等措施。这些都是为了在假设提示注入会发生的情况下,尽量降低风险。 现在我要把这些信息浓缩到100字以内。首先说明主题:安全与IT团队部署智能体的问题。然后提到OpenAI的Atlas模式正确处理了部分问题,并承认了未解决的安全威胁。接着提到提示注入攻击难以完全解决,并且扩大了威胁面。最后提到提供的清单来减少影响范围。 检查一下字数是否合适,确保不超过限制,并且表达清晰简洁。 </think> 文章探讨了安全与IT团队在部署智能体时面临的挑战与解决方案,指出OpenAI的Atlas模式在应对提示注入等安全威胁方面的局限性,并提供了一份清单以减少潜在风险的影响范围。 2026-1-2 05:9:15 Author: infosecwriteups.com(查看原文) 阅读量:0 收藏

For security and IT teams shipping agents: what Atlas got right, what it admits is unsolved, and the checklist to reduce blast radius.

MohamedAbdelmenem

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Made By Author

A developer hits Enter and watches an agent start browsing. Tabs flick open, a cursor blinks in a web form, and the tool pauses like it is thinking.

The coffee has gone cold, but the room feels hotter anyway.

OpenAI put the problem bluntly: “Prompt injection, much like scams and social engineering on the web, is unlikely to ever be fully ‘solved.’”

Read that again. That sentence matters.

Because once an agent can read emails and web pages and then take actions, outside text is no longer “content.” It is an input channel that can steer behavior.

OpenAI also conceded that “agent mode” in ChatGPT Atlas “expands the security threat surface.” That is a polite way of saying your demo just became a security boundary.

By the end, you will have a ship-ready checklist for browsing agents that assume injection will happen: least privilege, confirmation gates, input sanitization, and output validation.


文章来源: https://infosecwriteups.com/prompt-injection-is-permanent-your-ai-agent-needs-seatbelts-not-smarter-prompts-389d1c2696ce?source=rss----7b722bfd1b8d---4
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh