嗯，用户让我帮忙总结一篇文章的内容，控制在100字以内，而且不需要特定的开头。首先，我需要理解文章的主要内容。看起来这篇文章讲述的是一个关于漏洞赏金计划的故事，作者通过Google dorking发现了一个私人自托管的项目。赏金政策分为低、中、高、关键四个等级，分别对应50到500美元。不过作者提到吸引他的是产品本身，而不是赏金数额。文章还涉及业务逻辑漏洞、竞态条件和访问控制问题等技术细节，并鼓励读者点赞、评论和分享。 接下来，我需要把这些信息浓缩到100字以内。重点应该放在故事的主题、发现方式、赏金政策以及吸引作者的原因上。同时，还要提到文章的技术内容和互动部分。 可能的结构是：作者讲述在私人漏洞赏金计划中的经历，通过Google dorking发现目标，赏金政策明确，但产品特性更吸引人。过程中遇到技术挑战如业务逻辑漏洞等，并鼓励读者互动。 现在检查字数是否在限制内，并确保语言简洁明了。 </think> 作者分享了一次参与私人漏洞赏金计划的经历，通过Google dorking发现目标，赏金政策明确但产品特性更吸引人。过程中涉及业务逻辑漏洞、竞态条件等问题，并鼓励读者互动支持。 2025-12-25 14:33:59 Author: infosecwriteups.com(查看原文) 阅读量:4 收藏
Before we start this article, here is a quick note.
This is not a “run this command, get this bug” write-up. If you already follow me, you should be familiar with my style; if not, you will become my fan for sure.
🆓🆓 Free Link: Click Here
This is a story that includes all of my failed recon missions, boring scans, coffee breaks, and that one moment when, instead of thinking like a hacker, I started thinking like a normal user.
The Setup
About The Program
This story started on a private, self-hosted bug bounty program I found through Google dorking.
Not HackerOne.
Not Bugcrowd.
The bounty policy was straightforward:
- Low: $50
- Medium: $150
- High: $300
- Critical: $500
What caught my attention wasn’t the payout. It was the product.
If you enjoy real-world bug hunting stories that involve business logic vulnerabilities, race conditions, and broken access control, and if you like this blog, then🌐
50 claps 👏, a comment💬 and share everywhere.
would mean the world to me.
The Target
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh