Study Finds Software Testers Often Misjudge Which Techniques Work Best
好,我现在要帮用户总结这篇文章的内容。首先,我需要仔细阅读用户提供的文章内容,了解其主要信息。 看起来这篇文章是关于EScholar的,他们致力于将学术论文分享给全球科技社区。文章提到这些论文常常因为同行评审和助教的处理而被忽视,所以EScholar的平台帮助这些优秀的作品被更多人看到。 接下来,我需要将这些信息浓缩到100字以内。要注意不要使用“文章内容总结”之类的开头,直接描述即可。 重点包括:EScholar的目标、他们分享的内容、以及这些内容的价值。可能还需要提到他们如何帮助学术工作不被埋没。 最后,确保语言简洁明了,符合用户的要求。 </think> EScholar平台致力于将优秀的学术研究成果分享给全球科技社区,帮助那些常因同行评审或助教处理而被忽视的优秀论文获得更广泛的传播和认可。 2025-12-15 21:0:7 Author: hackernoon.com(查看原文) 阅读量:3 收藏

New Story

by

byEScholar: Electronic Academic Papers for Scholars@escholar

We publish the best academic work (that's too often lost to peer reviews & the TA's desk) to the global tech community

December 15th, 2025

Read on Terminal ReaderPrint this storyRead this story w/o Javascript

Read on Terminal ReaderPrint this storyRead this story w/o Javascript

featured image - Study Finds Software Testers Often Misjudge Which Techniques Work Best

Audio Presented by

    Speed

    Voice

EScholar: Electronic Academic Papers for Scholars

byEScholar: Electronic Academic Papers for Scholars@escholar

EScholar: Electronic Academic Papers for Scholars

About Author

EScholar: Electronic Academic Papers for Scholars HackerNoon profile picture

We publish the best academic work (that's too often lost to peer reviews & the TA's desk) to the global tech community

Comments

avatar

TOPICS

Related Stories


文章来源: https://hackernoon.com/study-finds-software-testers-often-misjudge-which-techniques-work-best?source=rss
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh