4 Minute Read
Security teams receive thousands of threat indicators daily. IP addresses, domain names, file hashes, and vulnerability advisories flood their inbox from multiple intelligence feeds. Yet when the next breach happens, you're still caught off guard. Sound familiar? The problem isn't a lack of information; it's a lack of context. Generic threat intelligence treats all organizations the same, regardless of whether they are in Australia, the US, or the UK, but your attack surface, business model, and risk profile are unique. Without understanding what matters specifically to your organization, threat intelligence becomes expensive noise. Before subscribing to another threat feed, ask yourself: what are you trying to protect, and how could it be attacked? Start with an asset discovery phase that goes beyond your network inventory. Your attack surface includes cloud infrastructure, remote workers, third-party integrations, and even your organization's public presence on social media, along with your physical facilities. Attackers don't respect organizational boundaries; they exploit whatever path offers the least resistance. Consider a healthcare organization: its attack surface includes not just medical devices and patient databases, but also HVAC systems, parking payment kiosks, and the personal devices of doctors accessing patient records from home. Each represents a potential entry point that requires different defensive strategies. Threat intelligence becomes actionable when you understand how your business actually operates. What systems would cause the most damage if compromised? Which data flows are critical to operations? Where are your single points of failure? For example, a logistics company might be most vulnerable to attacks targeting its route optimization systems, while a financial services firm needs to prioritize threats to its trading platforms. Generic malware signatures matter less than understanding who would want to target your specific business processes and why. Most threat intelligence suffers from what security professionals call "the list of badness" problem. You receive feeds containing millions of indicators with little information about their relevance to your environment. You get an alert about a new malware family, but you don't know if it targets your industry, your geography, or your technology stack. Without attribution and context, you can't prioritize response efforts effectively. Your team ends up chasing every threat equally, which effectively means they're chasing none of them well. Threat intelligence often arrives too late to be preventive and too early to be clearly relevant. By the time you receive indicators about a specific campaign, the attackers may have already moved on to new infrastructure. Conversely, early warnings about emerging threats may not include enough detail to take meaningful action. Intelligence feeds frequently lack the granular context needed for operational decision-making. Knowing that a particular threat actor targets healthcare organizations is useful, but knowing that they specifically exploit unpatched medical device vulnerabilities through spear-phishing campaigns targeting IT administrators is actionable. Effective threat intelligence starts with clearly defined intelligence requirements based on your organization's specific risk profile. Rather than consuming everything available, identify what you specifically need to know. This might include threats targeting your specific industry, attacks exploiting technologies in your environment, or campaigns originating from regions where you operate. For a retail organization, priority intelligence might focus on point-of-sale malware, e-commerce fraud techniques, and supply chain attacks. For a defence contractor, the focus would shift to advanced persistent threats, intellectual property theft, and nation-state activities. Raw indicators become valuable when enriched with organizational context. This means correlating external intelligence with your asset inventory, vulnerability assessments, and business processes. An IP address blocked by your firewall becomes more significant when you discover it's associated with attacks targeting your specific industry. Not all threats deserve equal attention. Develop a framework for prioritizing intelligence based on the potential business impact of successful attacks. This requires understanding your organization's crown jewels and the attack paths that could lead to their compromise. Effective threat intelligence doesn't just inform you about attacks, it helps you understand your organization through an attacker's eyes. When you achieve this perspective, you can finally move from reactive security to proactive defence. For example, in Australia and New Zealand, that often means measuring against frameworks like the ASD Essential Eight, ensuring compliance with APRA CPS 234, or understanding how IRAP-assessed environments are targeted. Your attack surface is unique. Your threats should be too. Ready to transform your threat intelligence program? Start by conducting a comprehensive attack surface assessment and mapping your organization's unique risk profile. The threats that matter most to your organization are the ones that understand your business as well as you do. Trustwave's Threat Intelligence-as-a-Service can provide you with timely, contextualized, and prioritized threat intelligence based on factors relevant to your operations and your exposed attack surface, enabling you to make risk-based and threat-informed decisions that benefit your organization.
Know Your Attack Surface Before You Know Your Threats
Map Your Digital Footprint
Understand Your Business Logic
The Context Problem: Why Generic Intelligence Fails
The Attribution Gap
The Timing Trap
The Relevance Problem
Building Intelligence That Actually Protects
Define Your Intelligence Requirements
Implement Contextual Enrichment
Prioritize Based on Business Impact
5 Practical Steps to Improve Your Intelligence Program