Port LLVM XRay to Apple systems
2023-6-18 12:0:0 Author: maskray.me(查看原文) 阅读量:15 收藏

I do not use Apple products myself, but I sometimes delve into Mach-O due to my interest in object file formats. Additionally, my LLVM/Clang changes sometimes require some understanding of Mach-O. Occasionally, I need to understand the format to some extent to work around its quirks (the old format inherited many problems of "a.out").

Recently, there has been interest (from Oleksii Lozovskyi) in enabling XRay, a function call tracing system in LLVM, to work on Apple systems. Intrigued by this, I decided to delve into the details and investigate the necessary changes. XRay supports many 64-bit architectures on Linux and some BSDs. I became acquainted with XRay back in 2017 and made some casual contributions since then.

If the target triple is x86_64-apple-darwin, you may notice that Clang will allow you to perform compilation, but linking will fail.

1
2
3
4
% clang --target=x86_64-apple-darwin -fxray-instrument -fxray-instruction-threshold=1 -c a.c
% clang --target=x86_64-apple-darwin -fxray-instrument -fxray-instruction-threshold=1 a.o
ld: in section __DATA,xray_instr_map reloc 0: X86_64_RELOC_SUBTRACTOR must have r_extern=1 file 'a.o' for architecture x86_64
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)

For arm64-apple-darwin, Clang rejected -fxray-instrument, but we can bypass this driver detection with -Xclang. (This is now accepted.)

1
2
% clang --target=arm64-apple-darwin -fxray-instrument -fxray-instruction-threshold=1 -c a.c
clang: error: the clang compiler does not support '-fxray-instrument on aarch64-apple-darwin'
1
2
% clang --target=arm64-apple-darwin -Xclang -fxray-instrument -Xclang -fxray-instruction-threshold=1 -c a.c
fatal error: error in backend: unsupported relocation of local symbol ''. Must have non-local symbol earlier in section.

I noticed that this fatal error is caused by an old workaround (2015) for ld64 and proposed to remove it: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152831.

SUBTRACTOR relocation types require r_extern==1

Let's examine clang -S --target=x86_64-apple-darwin -fxray-instrument -fxray-instruction-threshold=1 generated assembly.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
        .section        __DATA,xray_instr_map
Lxray_sleds_start0:
Ltmp0:
.quad Lxray_sled_0-Ltmp0 // problematic
.quad Lfunc_begin0-(Ltmp0+8) // problematic
.byte 0x00
.byte 0x00
.byte 0x02
.space 13
Ltmp1:
.quad Lxray_sled_1-Ltmp1 // problematic
.quad Lfunc_begin0-(Ltmp1+8) // problematic
.byte 0x01
.byte 0x00
.byte 0x02
.space 13
Lxray_sleds_end0:

I have marked 4 label differences as problematic. Let's examine the first one, .quad Lxray_sled_0-Ltmp0, which is represented as a pair of relocations (llvm-readobj -r a.o)

1
2
0x0 0 3 0 X86_64_RELOC_SUBTRACTOR 0 xray_instr_map
0x0 0 3 1 X86_64_RELOC_UNSIGNED 0 _foo

X86_64_RELOC_SUBTRACTOR is an external relocation (r_extern==1) where r_symbolnum references a symbol table entry. If r_extern==0, Linkers will produce an error. Symbols prefixed with "L" are considered temporary symbols in LLVMMC and are not included in the symbol table. LLVM integrated assembler attempts to rewrite A-B into A-B'+offset where B' can be included in the symbol table. B' is called an atom and should be a non-temporary symbol in the same section. However, since xray_instr_map does not define a non-temporary symbol, the X86_64_RELOC_SUBTRACTOR relocation will have no associated symbol, and its r_extern value will be 0.

To fix this issue, we need to define a non-temporary symbol in the section. We can accomplish this by renaming Lxray_sleds_start0 to lxray_sleds_start0 ("L" to "l"). In LLVMMC, LinkerPrivateGlobalPrefix is set to "l" for Apple targets. We can define an overload of MCContext::createLinkerPrivateTempSymbol(const Twine &Name) to allow LLVMMC to select an unused symbol starting with lxray_sleds_start. (There is a pitfall: we should not use "ltmp[0-9]+" which may collide with other compiler internal symbols.) For ELF targets, the MCContext::createLinkerPrivateTempSymbol function creates a temporary symbol starting with ".L".

Note: GNU assembler calls .L and L system-specific local label prefixes.

Function index section

Oleksii Lozovskyi reported that the -fxray-function-index option was not functioning as expected.

  • (default): no function index section
  • -fxray-function-index: no function index section
  • -fno-xray-function-index: function index section (xray_fn_idx) is present

Initially, the function index section was always present. The introduction of the -f[no-]xray-function-index option caused confusion due to the use of a negatively named variable, leading to potential misunderstandings. A clangDriver refactoring accidentally introduced this regression. I have resolved the issue for Clang 17.

Now that -fxray-function-index is back, we get the xray_fn_idx section by default. The section contains entries like the following:

1
2
3
4
.section        __DATA,xray_fn_idx
.p2align 4, 0x90
.quad Lxray_sleds_start0
.quad Lxray_sleds_end0

These absolute addresses require rebase opcodes in the special section __LINKEDIT,__rebase. This is not great and I wanted to fix it back in 2020 but never got around to do it. This motivated me to actually fix the issue and create https://reviews.llvm.org/D152661 to change the [start,end) representation to the (pc_relative_start, size) representation.

My initial attempt somehow wrote something like this. I took a difference of two labels, and right shifted it by 5 to get the number of sleds.

1
2
3
4
5
        .section        __DATA,xray_fn_idx,regular,live_support
.p2align 4, 0x90
lxray_fn_idx0:
.quad lxray_sleds_start0-lxray_fn_idx0
.quad (Lxray_sleds_end0-lxray_sleds_start0)>>5

This approach works on ELF targets but not on Mach-O targets due to a pile of assembler issues.

1
2
3
4
% clang -c --target=x86_64-apple-darwin a.s
/tmp/a-b0645c.s:53:8: error: expected relocatable expression
.quad (Lxray_sleds_end0-lxray_sleds_start0)>>5
^

Assembler issues

When assembling an assembly file into an object file, an expression can be evaluated in multiple steps. Two steps are particularly important:

  • Parsing time. At this stage, We have a MCAssembler object but no MCAsmLayout object. Instruction operands and certain directives like .if require the ability to evaluate an expression early.
  • Object file writing time. At this stage, we have both a MCAssembler object and a MCAsmLayout object. The MCAsmLayout object provides information about the offset of each fragment.

The first issue is not specific to this case and is also encountered in ELF. The following assembly code should assemble to the hex pairs 01000001, but Clang fails to compute .if .-1b == 3.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
% cat x.s
1:
.byte 1
.space 2
.if .-1b == 3
.byte 1
.else
.byte 0
.endif
% clang -c x.s
x.s:4:5: error: expected absolute expression
.if .-1b == 3
^

In 2019, Jian Cai implemented limited expression folding support to LLVM integrated assembler to support the Linux kernel arm use case.

1
2
arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S:169:143: error: expected absolute expression
.pushsection ".alt.smp.init", "a" ; .long 9998b ;9997: orr r1, r1, #((1 << 0) | (1 << 6))|(3 << 3) ; .if . - 9997b == 2 ; nop ; .endif ; .if . - 9997b != 4 ; .error "ALT_UP() content must assemble to exactly 4 bytes"; .endif ; .popsection

I have just added support for MCFillFragment (.space and .fill) and for A-B, where A is a pending label (which will be reassigned to a real fragment in flushPendingLabels()). Latest LLVM integrated assembler (milestone: LLVM 17) can successfully assemble x.s when a MCAssembler object is present. However, evaluation still does not work without a MCAssembler object, which is expected.

1
2
3
4
% llvm-mc x.s -filetype=null
x.s:4:5: error: expected absolute expression
.if .-1b == 3
^

Then I noticed a potential pitfall for Mach-O in MCSection::flushPendingLabels. When flushing pending labels, it did not ensure that the new fragment inherits the previous atom symbol. I fixed this issue, although I haven't been able to create a test case to verify this behavior.

After this fix, .quad (Lxray_sleds_end0-lxray_sleds_start0)>>5 can be successfully assembled. However, during "direct object emission", an error expected relocatable expression will be reported. The issue is quite subtle.

In the case of direct object emission, where LLVM IR is directly lowered to an object file bypassing assembly (e.g., using clang -c a.c instead of clang -c a.s or clang -c --save-temps a.c), the assembler information is not used at parse time (MCStreamer::UseAssemblerInfoForParsing). As a result, the assembly code .quad (Lxray_sleds_end0-lxray_sleds_start0)>>5 will be transformed into a fixup. Lxray_sleds_end0 is a pending label which will then be assigned to the next fragment when AsmPrinter emits new piece of data to the xray_instr_map section.

During object writing time, we have a MCAsmLayout object and atom information for fragments. LLVMMC evaluates the fixup with the MCAsmLayout object. However, since lxray_sleds_start0 and Lxray_sleds_end0 have different atoms, causing the condition in MachObjectWriter::isSymbolRefDifferenceFullyResolvedImpl to fail. In my opinion, it may be necessary to relax the condition in this case.

Linker dead stripping

Both xray_instr_map and xray_fn_idx sections contain independent pieces. To support linker dead stripping, also known as linker garbage collection, we need to add the S_ATTR_LIVE_SUPPORT attribute to the two sections.

Runtime library issues

The runtime library is located at compiler-rt/lib/xray and there are a number of issues.

First, compiler-rt/lib/xray/xray_trampoline_x86_64.S used .Ltmp* symbols which are temporary for ELF but non-temporary for Mach-O. The non-temporary labels become atoms and can cause bad dead stripping behaviors. I fixed the problem by using the LOCAL_LABEL macro, which generates an "L" symbol specifically for Mach-O.

compiler-rt/lib/xray/xray_trampoline_AArch64.S had a similar problem. I fixed it to look like the following:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
#include "../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_asm.h"
...
.p2align 2
.global ASM_SYMBOL(__xray_FunctionEntry)
ASM_HIDDEN(__xray_FunctionEntry)
ASM_TYPE_FUNCTION(__xray_FunctionEntry)
ASM_SYMBOL(__xray_FunctionEntry):

For Apple targets, # define ASM_SYMBOL(symbol) _##symbol prepends an underscore to the symbol name. For ELF targets, ASM_SYMBOL is the identity function.

Compiling compiler-rt/lib/xray/xray_trampoline_AArch64.S will give us an external definition (N_SECT | N_EXT) ___xray_FunctionEntry. The undefined reference from C++ code gives an undefined symbol ___xray_FunctionEntry (N_UNDF | N_EXT), which can be resolved by the definition.

1
Success = patchFunctionEntry(Enable, FuncId, Sled, __xray_FunctionEntry); 

Second, we need https://reviews.llvm.org/D153221 to build Mach-O runtimes for multiple architectures.

After the build system, we may discover new issues.

Driver change

Normally, we want to enable a Clang driver option when a feature is fully ready. In this case, we know the code generation has been working for a long time, and the full support (metadata section refactoring and runtime) will be implemented soon. Therefore, I believe it's acceptable to make the driver accept --target=arm64-apple-darwin -fxray-instrument as it makes testing the runtime more convenient.

Epilogue

As the work to port LLVM XRay to Apple systems continues, it is encouraging to witness the progress achieved thus far. The endeavor has given me opportunities to explore the Mach-O object file format.

There is a pending patch for ELF RISC-V support.


文章来源: https://maskray.me/blog/2023-06-17-port-llvm-xray-to-apple-systems
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh