The Authorization Circus: Where Security Was the Main Clown
嗯,用户让我帮忙总结一篇文章的内容,控制在100字以内,而且不需要用“文章内容总结”或者“这篇文章”这样的开头。直接写描述就行。首先,我得仔细阅读用户提供的文章内容。 看起来这篇文章是关于一个安全测试员在测试一家名为CircusTech的公司时的经历。他发现公司的授权系统非常不安全,存在很多漏洞,比如普通用户可以轻松获得管理员权限,甚至API有严重问题。这让他联想到马戏团的混乱场景。 接下来,我需要把重点提炼出来:测试员发现了严重的安全漏洞,包括权限问题和API缺陷。这些漏洞导致系统安全性极低,形同虚设。同时,用户希望总结控制在100字以内,并且直接描述内容。 现在,我要组织语言,确保信息准确且简洁。可能的结构是:测试员发现公司系统存在严重漏洞,导致权限失控和API缺陷,安全性极低。 检查一下字数是否符合要求,并确保没有使用任何开头的固定短语。这样应该能满足用户的需求。 </think> 一位安全测试员发现一家自称拥有“坚如磐石”授权系统的公司存在严重安全漏洞,普通用户可轻松获取管理员权限,API也存在重大缺陷,导致系统安全性形同虚设。 2025-11-9 09:22:23 Author: infosecwriteups.com(查看原文) 阅读量:16 收藏

Iski

Free Link 🎈

Hey there!😁

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Image by AI

You know that feeling when you go to the circus and realize the safety inspector is actually one of the clowns? Yeah, that was me last month, except instead of a circus, it was a company’s authorization system, and instead of falling anvils, I found falling access controls. Their security was such a three-ring disaster that I half-expected to see elephants walking tightropes while juggling admin privileges. 🐘

I was testing “CircusTech,” a company that claimed to have “rock-solid authorization” and “military-grade access controls.” What they actually had was more “clown-car security” where everyone could fit into the admin seat if they wiggled just right.

Act 1: The Ticket Booth That Gave Everyone Backstage Passes 🎟️

After my usual recon (I’ve started giving subfinder a standing ovation), I found CircusTech's API. I had a basic user account with permissions so limited I could barely change my profile…


文章来源: https://infosecwriteups.com/the-authorization-circus-where-security-was-the-main-clown-f4b84ca9356f?source=rss----7b722bfd1b8d---4
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh