$1000 Bounty: GitLab Security Flaw Exposed
嗯,用户让我用中文总结一篇文章,控制在100字以内,而且不需要特定的开头。首先,我得理解文章内容。文章讲的是一个漏洞赏金事件,1000美元,涉及到GitLab的GraphQL问题。这个漏洞让维护者能够删除仓库,后来被修复了。 用户可能是个开发者或者安全研究人员,想快速了解这个漏洞的情况。他们可能需要简洁明了的信息,用于学习或分享。所以我要抓住关键点:漏洞赏金、GitLab、GraphQL类型检查问题、维护者权限滥用、后果和修复。 确保语言简洁,不超过100字。比如:“文章描述了一个价值1000美元的漏洞赏金事件,揭示了GitLab中的一个GraphQL类型检查问题。该漏洞允许项目维护者滥用权限删除整个仓库。此问题已由GitLab修复。” 这样既涵盖了主要信息,又符合用户的要求。 </think> 文章描述了一个价值1000美元的漏洞赏金事件,揭示了GitLab中的一个GraphQL类型检查问题。该漏洞允许项目维护者滥用权限删除整个仓库。此问题已由GitLab修复。 2025-10-30 09:3:2 Author: infosecwriteups.com(查看原文) 阅读量:10 收藏

How a $1000 Bounty Hunt Revealed a GraphQL Type Check Nightmare Allowing Maintainers to Nuke Repositories

Monika sharma

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Hey folks, welcome back to another deep dive into the wild world of bug bounties! Today, we’re unpacking a slick vulnerability report that snagged a cool $1000 bounty on HackerOne. This report (858671) shines a spotlight on a sneaky GraphQL flaw in GitLab that let project maintainers users who shouldn’t be able to wipe out entire repositories like they were deleting spam emails.

I’ll break it down step by step: the what, the why, the how-to-reproduce, and the fallout. (Pro tip: GitLab fixed this beast, but understanding it could save your next API from a similar facepalm.)

The Setup: GitLab’s Permission Puzzle

GitLab is a powerhouse for code collab think GitHub but with more enterprise flair. In a typical project, roles are locked down tight:

  • Developer: Can code, review, but no deleting projects.
  • Maintainer: Can manage merges, issues, and snippets, but crucially, cannot delete or archive the repository. That’s owner/admin territory.

Enter GraphQL: GitLab’s shiny API for querying and mutating data efficiently. It’s…


文章来源: https://infosecwriteups.com/1000-bounty-gitlab-security-flaw-exposed-dd309788abb4?source=rss----7b722bfd1b8d--bug_bounty
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh