Cultural Lag Leaves Security as the Weakest Link
嗯,用户让我帮忙总结一篇文章,控制在100字以内,而且不需要用“文章内容总结”之类的开头。首先,我得通读一下这篇文章,理解它的主要观点。 文章主要讲的是安全文化的重要性,以及CISO角色的变化。作者提到过去安全被视为瓶颈,但现在需要将安全融入开发和决策的每个环节。这涉及到团队合作和文化转变,工程师和安全团队需要共同承担责任。 接下来,文章讨论了CISO的新职责,不仅仅是保护资产,还要影响战略决策。特别是在澳大利亚,新的法规要求CISO们更积极地参与到组织的高层管理中。同时,AI在安全中的应用也是一个重点,如何正确使用AI来提升安全性而不引入新的风险。 最后,作者强调了安全必须成为组织的基础,而不仅仅是流程的最后一步。这涉及到持续保障和适应新兴的监管要求。 总结的时候要抓住这些关键点:安全文化转变、CISO角色扩展、AI的应用、以及安全作为基础的重要性。控制在100字以内的话,可能需要精简一些细节。 可能会这样组织语言:强调文化转变、CISO的战略角色、AI的影响、以及安全作为基础的重要性。确保每个要点都涵盖到,并且语言简洁明了。 </think> 文章强调了现代安全文化转变的重要性,指出安全必须融入开发与决策的每个环节,而非事后补救。工程师与安全团队需共同承担责任,实现组织韧性。CISO角色正在扩展,从单纯保护资产转向影响战略决策,需具备技术与沟通能力,应对复杂合规要求及新兴技术挑战如AI应用。 2025-12-5 16:19:22 Author: securityboulevard.com(查看原文) 阅读量:3 收藏

For too long, security has been cast as a bottleneck – swooping in after developers build and engineers test to slow things down. The reality is blunt; if it’s bolted on, you’ve already lost. The ones that win make security part of every decision, from the first line of code to the last boardroom conversation.

The real challenge is cultural. Engineers and security teams need to stop pointing fingers and start owning resilience together. That means being able to see clearly across environments, projects and teams. Without communal visibility into how applications, workloads, and security processes are performing, it’s impossible to know where vulnerabilities lie or how to close them before attackers exploit them.

The Cultural Shift Required for Modern Security

Credentials and certifications matter far less than practical ability. What counts is whether a security professional can raise awareness, educate colleagues, and build systems that can withstand failure. Because the risk of failure is inevitable; even the most cyber secure company is vulnerable to being breached, and we’ve seen several Australian heavyweights fall victim in recent years. The measure of maturity is whether you treat that as paralysis, or as fuel to adapt faster.

That cultural shift is still missing in many enterprises. Too many security leaders operate as auditors. Too many development teams see security as someone else’s problem. DevSecOps forces those worlds to collide, and that’s exactly what makes it powerful.

This shift is also rewriting what it means to be a Chief Information Security Officer (CISO). Once you take the role, you are an organisation leader, whether you like it or not. The job isn’t just protecting assets; it’s influencing strategy.

Australia’s own regulatory shifts are making that painfully clear. The introduction of mandatory ransomware reporting, higher fines under the Privacy Act, and APRA’s CPS 234 and CPS 230 standards mean breaches now carry board-level accountability. CISOs can no longer operate in the shadows of the IT function. The role demands fluency with engineers, credibility with boards, and the ability to translate risk into organisation terms.

But the ‘right’ CISO looks different for every organisation. In some, the hardcore technical operator is essential. In others, it’s the communicator who can win investment and align priorities. The danger is when organisations try to split those roles.

We’ve seen experiments with one CISO for compliance and another for operations, particularly in highly regulated industries. But when accountability is divided, it’s never clear who owns the fallout. In technology organisations especially, that model doesn’t work.

Complicating matters further is Australia’s tightening patchwork of compliance. Financial services are grappling with APRA’s operational resilience rules, healthcare providers face stricter data-handling standards, and critical infrastructure operators must meet obligations under the SOCI Act; the compliance map is only getting more complex.

CISOs can’t afford to treat regulation as paperwork. They reshape how organisations operate, and without observability across sprawling technology stacks, it’s easy to miss how one system change creates new blind spots elsewhere.

AI is a prime example. It is both a powerful security tool and a regulatory minefield. Used well, AI can automate monitoring, speed response times, and relieve pressure on overstretched teams. Used poorly, it multiplies complexity, drowns teams in alerts, and creates compliance gaps that regulators will pounce on.

That’s why understanding AI, and being able to see how it’s behaving across the environment, is no longer optional. Security leaders must guide adoption in a way that unlocks innovation while building trust with regulators, customers, and employees.

The bottom line is clear; security can’t be the final step in a process. It has to be the foundation to help organisations shift towards Continuous Assurance, supporting organisations as they build, scale, and adapt to emerging A/NZ regulatory reporting.

How CISO Leadership Is Being Redefined

CISOs are no longer the people who say no at the end of the workflow. They are the people who help organisations say yes with confidence, to new products, new markets, and new technologies. That requires cultural change, resilience, and above all, complete visibility across environments so leaders can anticipate risks before they escalate.

Treating breaches as career-ending disasters only breeds paralysis. Seeing them instead as signals for improvement turns security into a driver of innovation. It shifts the conversation from cost to value, from auditing to strategy, and from reacting to threats to building trust at every level of the business. That is what will define the next generation of security leadership.


文章来源: https://securityboulevard.com/2025/12/cultural-lag-leaves-security-as-the-weakest-link/
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh