A hash function is an arithmetic function that transforms an input (or a ‘message’) into a string of a predetermined number of bytes. The output, such as a hash code or a hash value, is often an equivalent of the data inputs provided.
It is used to describe hash functions as methods that can quickly map large sets of data that may be of arbitrary size and length to values of constant size.
At the same time, hash functions are effectively applied in such tasks as data retrieval, data encryption, and data validation. In cryptography, hash functions are of greater significance as they confirm data consistency.
A good hash function has several fundamental properties: it should always be deterministic so that input will always yield the same outcome, and efficient computation time. It should also avoid collisions where two different messages give the same hash value.
Moreover, for two arbitrary inputs, the difference should be very significant when converted through the hash function, referred to as the avalanche effect.
This is useful in applications such as storing passwords, implementing signatures, and checking data integrity.
Also Read: Encryption, Encoding, and Hashing Explained
Hashing is a process where an input, known commonly as a ‘message’, is processed through a hash function. This function converts the input into a string of a fixed number of characters, popularly known as the hash value or hash code.
The process starts with the input processing, wherein any data size can be anything from one character to a file, and the hash function will process it. The hash function then applies mathematical algorithms and bit logical operations; thus, the bit sequences are rearranged.
This position makes sure that even a slight change in the input produces a significantly different value, which exhibits a property called the avalanche effect.
Regardless of the input data, the value of the hash result remains of a specific size, which depends on the used hash function, for example, 256 bits for SHA-256.
A good hash function is a crucial factor in data security and management since it adds to the data integrity when organized in a database.
Here are the fundamental properties that define a robust hash algorithm:
A robust hash algorithm always yields a hash value from the same input since it has an invariant property for all the messages that hash through the algorithm. This property makes sure that information is verified and documented dependably and coherently.
While using the hash function, the hash value output has a fixed size, even with a significant and long string value of the input. This characteristic is essential for getting the values consistently of a simple uniform structure for storage and comparison.
Certain desirable attributes can be expected from the hash algorithm, one of them being efficiency. That is, it should be able to process data and come up with a hash value in the shortest time possible.
This efficiency is necessary for measurement, mainly when working with enormous databases or extensive amounts of transactions.
The work should be such that no one should be able to work backward and get the original message that created the hash value. This property that guarantees the hash value does not in any way reflect the input is an added advantage in security.
Hashing with a good security level decreases the probability of having two different strings as inputs and having the same hash. This is important in the preservation of data as well as discouragement of any ill-intentioned activities on the compound.
A small input change should result in a very different hash value. This property means that even by inputting slightly different inputs, the hash values produced will considerably differ, making it harder for hackers or other aspiring attackers to guess the next hash.
The hash values should smoothly spread or distribute over the output space. This feature avoids clusters and makes a good distribution of hash values, determining that their occurrence will be less frequent and, therefore, the efficiency of hash-based data structures will increase.
The figure shows that each bit of the hash value should depend on each bit of the input. This property makes it hard to predict how to manipulate the hash value by slightly changing the input, since the output will change in the corresponding proportion.
MD5 generates a 128-bit hash value, and it was once commonly used for checksums and data integrity checks. MD5 was highly popular at the beginning of hash usage, but is now considered cryptographically broken and unable to be used further.
This is because of the numerous and easily exploitable collisions that occur, as two completely different things can produce the same hash.
Also Read: Difference Between 128-bit and 256-bit SSL Encryption
SHA-1 produces a 160-bit hash value, and it is widely used in many security applications and protocols, such as SSL certificates and digital signatures.
This has, however, raised the security issues that have enabled it to be attacked via collision attacks, hence replacement by security-enhanced successors like SHA-2 and SHA-3.
The SHA-2 family of hash functions creates the hash values of 224 bits, 256 bits, 384 bits, and 512 bits.
The information security hash algorithms, such as SHA-256 and SHA-512, are popular in applications that require data integrity over cryptocurrencies, cryptographic applications, and digital signatures due to their security and robustness against known cryptographic attacks.
SHA-3 is the recent version of the information authentication standard within the SHA family, which has been developed to act as the contingency if SHA-2 fails to perform as required.
It employs a different fundamental algorithm, the Keccak algorithm, and it is applied in many security applications that require hash functions with very high and very fast security performance.
RIPEMD-160 generated a 160-bit hash value and was created to be more secure compared to the MD5 and SHA-1 versions. It is applied in numerous cryptographic uses and digital signatures; it occupies an intermediate position between reliability and speed.
It has been observed that BLAKE2 is a well-defined, fast, and secure cryptographic hash function, which is much more efficient than MD5 and SHA-2.
Because of these ancient yet robust security characteristics and their efficiency, SHA is applied in multiple scenarios, such as cryptographic techniques and hash tables.
Hashing is one of the simplest solutions to guarantee the solution’s integrity while still being efficient. When data is hashed, users are assured that the data as hashed has not been tampered with or is in any form corrupted.
This is because every alteration of the original data leads to a different hash value, thus indicating tampering or errors within the shortest time possible.
Hashing helps store big data securely for clients’ privacy and information security. For example, passwords that must be stored in the database are usually hashed beforehand.
This also helps if the attacker gets hold of the hashed passwords, since reversing the hash to get the original passwords is almost unthinkable because of the one-way processes of hash functions.
Hashing also makes data searches and comparisons more accessible and efficient. Hash tables employ a hash, a mathematical function, to map the data in and out to enable easy search.
That efficiency is desirable for databases, file systems, and many other applications that deal with large amounts of data.
Hashing offers a method of recasting extensive data sets into smaller ones that can be more easily stored and processed.
Every set is a fixed-size hash value of the original data, no matter how big the set may be. This intention is similar to the applications in digital signatures and fingerprinting in that it minimizes the amount of summarized information.
By its very nature, hash functions need to be fast and computationally inexpensive. This speed makes hashing ideal for real-time use, for example, data checking for consistency, encryption and decryption, and secure communication, among others, and it cannot slow down the processor much.
While most hash functions currently in the market are relatively vital, there is never a telltale chance that two different inputs can generate the same hash value.
This can degrade hash operations of the data structure and the hash security schemes if not well managed.
As evident from the above discussion, the one-way nature of hashing is a big plus when it comes to security, but it becomes a negative attribute when the actual data is required to be retrieved.
When data is hashed, one cannot operate to unhash that piece of data, which is always tragic, especially when data is required to be recovered.
A hash function has to make different inputs generate different outputs, even if the input differences are minimal. This makes it very sensitive and capable of detecting changes that may be desirable.
However, on the same note, it has low flexibility in that it will always pick up on changes that may not necessarily be changes, but should be tolerances.
This is more apparent in numerous hashing operations, especially on big data sets, where the computational burden may be significant.
This can result in performance bottlenecks, especially if the application has to run in resource-limited environments or real-time systems where performance is critical.
In specific applications, such as hash tables or blockchain, the storage space required for hash values can be substantial, especially if the dataset is large. This can lead to increased storage requirements and associated costs.
Hash functions are used widely to provide data integrity features. It is used to analyze an array of data, where a hash value or checksum is created to assure the users that the data has not been tampered with while in transit or storage.
Any alteration of the original data means that the hash value is different, and this notifies the user of this change, thereby making it impossible to tamper with the data without being noticed.
Passwords are stored as hash values rather than plain text in secure systems that are impossible for a hacker to decipher. When a user enters a password, the password that he enters is passed through a hashing process, and the resultant hash is compared with the hash stored in the database.
This helps ensure that the passwords themselves stored in the hash cannot be retrieved even if there is a breach in the storage. It makes the hash a one-way function where it is computationally impossible to reverse the hash to obtain the password.
The hash functions are involved in digital signatures. Whenever one signs a document in digital form, a hash of the document is made, and then the digital signature is encrypted with the help of the signer’s private key.
Also Read: Digital Signature vs Electronic Signature
The receiver can then use the signer’s public key to decrypt it and compare it with a new hash of the document in order to both authenticate and check for document integrity.
Hashing is a crucial element utilized in blockchain technology. Every block has the previous block’s hash to set blocks from a chain.
Once data or a transaction is entered into the block, it cannot be tampered with without altering the entire chain, giving it a layer of security and reliability.
One of the critical roles that hash functions play is in data deduplication, where they help identify data duplicates.
Using hash values of the present data chunks, the systems can match these hash values to identify and eliminate duplicates with far less storage space and time.
| Aspect | Hashing | Encryption |
| Purpose | Verify data integrity | Protect data confidentiality |
| Reversibility | Irreversible | Reversible |
| Output | Fixed-length hash value | Variable-length ciphertext |
| Use Case | Password storage, data integrity checks | Data transmission, data storage, secure communications |
| Key Requirement | No key required | Requires a key (symmetric or asymmetric) |
| Common Algorithms | SHA-256, MD5, SHA-1 | AES, RSA, DES, Blowfish |
| Security Level | Depends on hash algorithm and length | Depends on encryption algorithm and key length |
| Collision Resistance | Important for security | Not applicable |
| Speed | Typically faster | Typically slower |
| Data Size | Fixed size regardless of input data length | Size of ciphertext can be larger than plaintext |
| Vulnerabilities | Susceptible to collisions (for weak algorithms) | Susceptible to brute-force, key management issues |
Read More on Hashing vs Encryption – Know the Difference
Improve your online security and convey credibility to your clients right now with our Robust Encryption Solutions.
Janki Mehta is a passionate Cyber-Security Enthusiast who keenly monitors the latest developments in the Web/Cyber Security industry. She puts her knowledge into practice and helps web users by arming them with the necessary security measures to stay safe in the digital world.