DAST vs AI Code: Why Dynamic Application Security Testing Can’t Keep Pace
Traditional DAST require 2025-10-28 12:53:29 Author: securityboulevard.com(查看原文) 阅读量:0 收藏

DAST vs AI Code

Traditional DAST requires 8+ hours for comprehensive scanning while AI-generated code deploys 10 times daily. This speed mismatch creates a fundamental security gap: most organizations run DAST weekly, leaving 70+ deployments unchecked between scans. The Contrast Runtime Security Platform offers a fundamentally different approach by embedding security directly into application runtime to detect vulnerabilities as they deploy and block attacks as they happen.

Cruise Con 2025

*** This is a Security Bloggers Network syndicated blog from AppSec Observer authored by Jake Milstein. Read the original post at: https://www.contrastsecurity.com/security-influencers/dast-vs-ai-code-why-dynamic-application-security-testing-cant-keep-pace


文章来源: https://securityboulevard.com/2025/10/dast-vs-ai-code-why-dynamic-application-security-testing-cant-keep-pace/
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh