Quickpost: Electrical Power & Mining
文章作者尝试使用RTX 3080 GPU进行加密货币挖矿24小时后发现,虽然成功开采了少量比特币(约€0.39),但电力消耗高达13,024 kWh,额外成本为€3,91。作者进一步分析发现利用太阳能发电反而能获得更高收益(约€0.86)。结论是,在当前电价下,加密货币挖矿并不经济可行。 2025-2-10 00:0:0 Author: blog.didierstevens.com(查看原文) 阅读量:24 收藏

Quickpost: Electrical Power & Mining

I was wondering: how costly is crypto mining for me?

I let an easy-to-use mining application run on my desktop computer (RTX 3080 GPU) for 24 hours.
After 24 hours, the miner reported that I had mined 0,00000365 BTC, and that this would earn me €0,39. The electrical power consumption of my desktop computer for that period was 13,024 kWh.

How much does 13 kWh cost me? Here in Belgium, we pay a lot of taxes on our utility bill. So just multiplying 13 kWh with the cost for 1 kWh would not produce realistic costs.
What I did instead: I took my utility bill of December 2024, with all the taxes, and created a spreadsheet that re-calculates all of the costs and taxes. That gives me a spreadsheet were I can simulate changes to my bill and see what the final result is. And with that spreadsheet, I increased my electrical power consumption for December 2024 with 13,024 kWh. That gave me an extra cost of €3,91.

Spending €3,91 to earn €0,39 is not viable at all.

But what if I would run the miner only when my solar panels produce enough power? That’s free electricity, right?

Yes, but … my electricity supplier also pays me money for the solar power I produce and don’t consume (e.g., inject).
Injecting 13,024 kWh would earn me €0,86. So that’s at least double the amount that mining would earn me.

Conclusion: as long as electricity tariffs don’t change significantly, mining is not financially viable for me. One would be better of buying BTC with the small payouts for injected power.


Quickpost info


No comments yet.


文章来源: https://blog.didierstevens.com/2025/02/10/quickpost-electrical-power-mining/
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh